EVALUATION PROGRAM OF WORK PRACTICE IN INDUSTRIAL VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL (Seen From Respondents Teacher Supervisor)

This study aimed to describe the context, input, process, product industry work practices program at SMK Negeri 1 Lintau. This research is CIPP evaluation model. The methodology used is the method of combination (Mixed Methods) design verification sequence (Sequential Explanatory). The research was conducted at SMK Negeri 1 Lintau. The informants are the principal, chairman prakerin, tutor, mentor and student industry. The technique of collecting data through observation, questionnaires, and interviews. Based on data analysis found that the level of achievement prakerin program from the aspects of respondents Teacher Advisor to the variable context prakerin program at SMK Negeri 1 Lintau amounted to 83.77% in both categories. Input variables prakerin program at SMK Negeri 1 Lintau for 82,23% in both categories. Variable process prakerin program at SMK Negeri 1 Lintau amounted to 79.40% with enough.Variabel product category prakerin program at SMK Negeri 1 Lintau amounted to 80.75%.


INTRODUCTION
Vocational education is part of the education system in many countries. In (2) confirms also that vocational education priority to preparing students to enter the workforce and to develop a professional attitude. Vocational high school (SMK) is a formal educational institution that aims to produce middle-level manpower. As formal education institutions, vocational take responsibility for reform, improving the expertise and skills of the students so as to produce a quality workforce, can enter the labor market both regionally and globally. Evaluation is an activity to gather information about the workings of something, hereinafter the information is used to determine appropriate alternatives in making decisions (Suharsimi). To obtain a professional workforce that created labor efficient and effective manner in the workplace training or also known as On the Job Training, which in vocational education is also called Work Practices Industry (Prakerin).
Prakerin is a form of organization of education and vocational training that combines learning activities in school and learning activities through working directly in the field as well as the atmosphere of the real and relevant in the world of work / industry. Prakerin also activities that are required to travel for vocational students and part of the PSG.
The purpose of this evaluation is an effort of collecting, processing, and presentation of data that will be used as input for decision-making on prakerin program. 1) Distrust DU / DI on the competence of the students' work makes the DU / DI thought that the presence of students in prakerin still a burden, 2) lack of explanation and guidance provided by the DUDI to students as participants Prakerin, 3) lack of debriefing before Prakerin obtained by students in SMK 1 Lintau, 4) Lack of good communications between students and instructors DUDI, 5) lack of job readiness owned by the students, In this study, the objectives are 1) to describe the context (context) that exist in the program Prakerin in SMK N 1 Lintau terms of the objectives of the program and the environment in which the program Prakerin, 2) Describe the Input (input) that exist in the program Prakerin in SMK N 1 Lintau in terms of human resources, facilities, and infrastructure, as well as program funding Prakerin, 3) Describe the process (process) Prakerin implementation in SMK N 1 Lintau in terms of preparation, implementation, and evaluation stages Prakerin program. 4) Describe the results (product) that has been gained from Prakerin program at SMK N 1 Lintau in terms of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor students who carry Prakerin program. The methodology used in this study is the combination method (Mixed metod) with Sequence Design Verification (Sequential Explanatory). Sugiyono (2011: 415) states "research method that combines quantitative and qualitative methods respectively, where in the early stages done using quantitative methods and phase two use qualitative methods". Quantitative methods serve to obtain measurable quantitative data that can be descriptive, comparative associative and qualitative methods serve to prove, deepen, broaden, and weaken abort quantitative data which have been obtained at an early stage.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this study, quantitative data obtained from a questionnaire distributed to 287 students in SMK 1 Lintau, 16 mentors and 10 DUDI school counselors. The questionnaire consists of four aspects: a) aspects of the context, b) input aspect and c) aspects of the process, d) aspects of the product. As for the qualitative data obtained from interviews conducted to student participants prakerin.

Aspects Context
Aspects prakerin context of three indicators of program objectives prakerin, cooperation DU / DI with the school and hope that the implementation of prakerin according to curriculum implementation. Presentation of the level of achievement of the respondents tutor each item of context prakerin aspect can be seen in Table 1:

Aspect input
Prakerin input aspect which is divided into three indicators of readiness of participants in carrying out prakerin, briefing material absorption of DU / DI and schools as well as the realization of the implementation of the curriculum implementation. Presentation of the level of achievement of the respondents for each item of input prakerin aspect can be seen in Table 2.

Aspect Process
Aspects prakerin process which is divided into three indicators of monitoring and mentoring students in prakerin, involvement / participation of students in prakerin and student collaboration and problem solving skills. Presentation of the level of achievement of the respondents to each item of aspects prakerin process can be seen in Table 3, below:

Aspects products
Aspects of product consisting of two indicators of improvement and mastery of student competence and certification of students. Presentation of the level of achievement of the respondents to each item of product prakerin aspect can be seen in Table 4, As for the indicators obtained the process according to expectations percentage amounted to 95.8% with very good category. Later in the match reality aspect prakerin product obtained percentage rate of 80.75% in both categories. As for the product corresponding indicator gained hope percentage rate of 95.85% with a very good category.